________________________________________________________________________________________ | |||||||
|
American Consulting Volume XXII, Number 5 March 19, 2001 1015 15th Street, NW E-mail acec@acec.org Francis George, Editor
Design Build ... What Makes Owners Sophisticated Like design professionals and contractors, owners develop through experience an appreciation and understanding of the unique culture of the design-build process. Design-build delivery comes with a significant learning curve for both owners and design-builders. Therefore, owners with meaningful design-build experience under their belts are more likely to be better prepared. Many federal agencies are generally recognized to be experienced owners and are more likely to be better prepared than smaller local agencies implementing one of their first design-build projects. Frequently, less sophisticated owners underestimate the up-front work necessary to define their project and process. As a result, less sophisticated owners are often disappointed that they "got what they paid for." Owners look to design-build project delivery to minimize the administrative burden on their staff. While this can be true during the construction process, lack of active owner involvement can be detrimental during the development of the proposal documents and during the design process. Proposal development is the key to project success and owners must work with their consultants to properly define the scope and design criteria. Design decisions can occur rapidly with design-build project delivery. Owners must be prepared to commit substantial resources – either their own or those of an advisor – to justifying construction documents to their initial request for proposal, and the design-builder’s technical and price proposals. Excerpted from Multiple Delivery Systems Handbook on Design-Build Project Delivery, by the ACEC Professional Procurement Committee and Ben Perez, Editor. Design-Build Project Delivery is available for sale through the ACEC Bookshop (as item #LW-371), $29 members, $39 nonmembers, $4 s/h. Orders should be sent to ACEC (fax 202-789-7220, or e-mail publications@acec.org). Include your Mastercard, Visa, or American Express number with the expiration date, contact name, firm name, street address, phone number, and e-mail address. |
ACEC-supported Tax Cut Passes House – All Eyes Turn to
Senate The House of Representatives recently passed H.R. 3, the Economic
Growth and Tax Relief Act of 2001. The legislation includes
broad-based individual income tax rate cuts that are the centerpiece
of President Bush’s $1.6-trillion tax relief plan that will help
small businesses and individuals. The estate tax, as well as other
tax measures important to engineers, will soon follow in later
phases of the tax package. ACEC has taken a leading position in the President’s TRC (Tax
Relief Coalition). As a steering committee member, ACEC has worked
closely with the White House and other industry associations to
lobby for this important bill. ACEC Executive VP Dave Raymond hosted
eight members of the White House staff, along with other industry
executives, to advise the White House on industry views. ACEC’s president, Arnie Spiess applauded the work that has been
done to bring about this key tax priority. Spiess said, "Businesses
like partnerships and S corporations, which pay income taxes at
individual rates, will benefit greatly from the rate cuts." "Consulting Congress Day will help keep the momentum going as
H.R. 3 moves on to the Senate. Here is where the real battle lies;
ACEC will gear up its grassroots efforts for a full court press on
key Senators," said Spiess. ACEC Small Firm Council members recently participated in events
with the House of Representatives leadership to express their
support for President Bush’s proposals. More than two-thirds of the private engineering firms in the
United States are small companies, most structured as sole
proprietorships, partnerships, or S corporations. ACEC member Cathy
Ritter, President of Constellation Design Group, said during an
NBC Nightly News interview that "tax relief would allow me to
increase salaries, continue education and training, provide
additional health or life insurance, equip our computers with the
latest software, or investigate employee benefits that are currently
out of reach. In short, I would be able to invest in my company’s
future by spending present
dollars." The Board of Directors of ACEC has officially named Jeff M.
Daggett as Treasurer, effective March 1, 2001, through May 2002.
Daggett is completing the term of Robert E. Hickman, who has taken
an assignment with his firm (Earth TECH) in Australia. Daggett is
CEO of W&H Pacific in Botell, Washington. State Finality and Liability Issues Are The House Energy and Commerce Committee held an informational
hearing this week to determine the scope of any future brownfields
bill. One of the key witnesses was EPA Administrator Christine Todd
Whitman. Whitman stressed the importance of developing bipartisan
legislation to remove existing barriers to brownfields
cleanup and development. In her testimony before the Subcommittee on
Environment and Hazardous Materials Committee, she emphasized the
need for flexibility when working with states. Whitman stated that legislation should ensure that states have
their own authority to run their own programs, that the EPA work
with states to ensure they employ high but flexible standards, and
that EPA should be allowed to step in to enforce those standards
when necessary. She stressed there should be limited circumstances
where the EPA should step in if a state approves protective cleanup,
such as when there is compelling evidence that cleanup is no longer
protecting human health and the environment. She highlighted that
legislation should clarify Superfund liability for contiguous
property owners, prospective purchasers, and innocent landowners.
More information: Emily Baker (ebaker@acec.org) at
ACEC. Penn Student Wins ACEC’s Top Scholar Award ACEC presented its Scholar of the Year Award to Shannon Appleby
of Penn State University during National Engineers Week. ACEC
President Arnie Spiess awarded Appleby the $5,000 scholarship award
during the Future Cities Competition in Washington, DC. A fifth year
student, Appleby is majoring in Architectural Engineering and will
graduate in 2002. Graduate Enrollment in Science /Engineering
Increases Graduate student enrollment in science and engineering (S&E)
in the United States increased in 1999 after five consecutive annual
decreases, according to the National Science Foundation/Division of
Science Resources Studies’ Survey of Graduate Students and
Post-doctorates in Science & Engineering. In fall 1999, 411,308 students were enrolled in graduate S&E
programs, a two-percent increase from 1998’s 404,903. The number of
full-time students enrolled for the first time in graduate
science and engineering programs increased for the third consecutive
year, signaling possible continued increases in total
enrollment. Engineering enrollment rose one percent in 1999. A number of
engineering fields accounted for the increase, including aerospace,
electrical, mechanical, biomedical, and petroleum. But, enrollment
in several larger engineering fields (chemical, civil, and
industrial) continued to decline. To view a complete chart of the
survey results, visit www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/databrf/nsf01312/sdb01312.htm. Vienna, Virginia, is the setting for ACEC’s 2001 Cyber Practice
Conference, the focus of which is the current and projected use of
electronic technology to design and deliver engineering and
construction services. The April 26-27 conference is sponsored in
part by Victor O. Schinnerer & Co. Industry leaders, consultants and technical representatives from
state-of-the-art vendors will discuss the impact of internet-based
project management and related tools on business operations, risk
management, and profitability. The conference will be at the
Sheraton Premiere Hotel, 8661 Leesburg Pike, Vienna, VA. More
information: ACEC Education Department (202-347-7474, www.acec.org). | ||||||