Engineering & Public Works Roadshow

Watch the Roadshow events and view interviews, photos, and more at the official website.

speaker during the engineering & public works roadshow event

Video Gallery

About ACEC

YouTube video
YouTube video
YouTube video
YouTube video

ACEC Informational Videos

YouTube video
YouTube video

Engineering Influence Podcasts & Interviews

Recorded at ACEC's 2026 Convention & Legislative Summit, days before the House T&I Committee was set to mark up the surface transportation reauthorization, two former committee chairmen — Republican Bill Shuster of Pennsylvania and Democrat Peter DeFazio of Oregon — sat down to assess where things stand.

They cover the state of play on the reauth: whether Sam Graves and Rick Larson can get a bipartisan bill to the floor, how leadership dynamics have shifted from the IIJA era, and whether infrastructure still carries the political weight it once did heading into a tight midterm.

On financing, both back vehicle miles traveled as the long-term path — and explain why the privacy objection has largely collapsed among younger voters. DeFazio recounts how the climate provisions in his original IIJA bill cost him Republican votes, and why he needed those same Republicans to ultimately get it passed.

They also make a direct case for earmarks — not as pork, but as the mechanism that lets members fight for their districts.

Key topics:
— Reauthorization timeline and committee dynamics (0:26)
— Sam Graves, Rick Larson, and the bipartisan path forward (1:15)
— VMT tax and the shrinking privacy objection (4:05)
— The IIJA backstory: climate provisions, the Squad, and Republican rescues (6:20)
— The earmarks argument (8:00)

Engineering Influence is the podcast of the American Council of Engineering Companies
Reps. Peter DeFazio and Bill Shuster Discuss the Current State of Congress

Recorded at ACEC's 2026 Convention & Legislative Summit, days before the House T&I Committee was set to mark up the surface transportation reauthorization, two former committee chairmen — Republican Bill Shuster of Pennsylvania and Democrat Peter DeFazio of Oregon — sat down to assess where things stand.

They cover the state of play on the reauth: whether Sam Graves and Rick Larson can get a bipartisan bill to the floor, how leadership dynamics have shifted from the IIJA era, and whether infrastructure still carries the political weight it once did heading into a tight midterm.

On financing, both back vehicle miles traveled as the long-term path — and explain why the privacy objection has largely collapsed among younger voters. DeFazio recounts how the climate provisions in his original IIJA bill cost him Republican votes, and why he needed those same Republicans to ultimately get it passed.

They also make a direct case for earmarks — not as pork, but as the mechanism that lets members fight for their districts.

Key topics:
— Reauthorization timeline and committee dynamics (0:26)
— Sam Graves, Rick Larson, and the bipartisan path forward (1:15)
— VMT tax and the shrinking privacy objection (4:05)
— The IIJA backstory: climate provisions, the Squad, and Republican rescues (6:20)
— The earmarks argument (8:00)

Engineering Influence is the podcast of the ACEC Research Institute.

YouTube Video UExQeEtMV0Iyb0lRd3VReHdxVW9rZHFBTHY4ZGVzNjEyeC5CODAzNTc5NEFERjkzMDQ0

Reps. Peter DeFazio and Bill Shuster Discuss the Current State of Congress

Market Intelligence Updates

Engineering Influence Podcast Ad